0% read on this device
Browse the curriculum

Start Here

Vision

First Principles

Operating Model

Domain Model

Agent Factory

Runtime Architecture

AI Engineering

Autonomous Workflows

Verification & Delivery

Factory Platform

Quality Engineering

Security & Governance

Case Studies

Labs

Interview Practice

Research Journal

Reference

Curriculum/Labs/A rapid review of the chapter’s existing Quick Read, principles, definitions, lessons, and review material.
Labs2 min readlabexecutable lab

Repository Onboarding and Readiness Lab

Demonstrate that repository registration, discovery, owner validation, indexing, and workflow admission are separate, evidence backed steps.

Status: Review readyRisk: highLifecycle: intent · planContent reviewed 2026-08-30Maturity guide →
Claim boundaryThis chapter references implementation evidence. Inspect its evidence boundary before treating a claim as proven.
study mode

A rapid review of the chapter’s existing Quick Read, principles, definitions, lessons, and review material.

Hands-on lab

Demonstrate that repository registration, discovery, owner validation, indexing, and workflow admission are separate, evidence backed steps.

Execute the existing Markdown instructions and retain the required output and evidence.

practice2 min chapter
Jump to validation criteria

Objective

Demonstrate that repository registration, discovery, owner validation, indexing, and workflow admission are separate, evidence-backed steps.

Prerequisites and starting state

Use a disposable repository with at least one application, tests, a dependency manifest, CI configuration, documentation, and one intentionally undocumented requirement. Use read-only credentials during discovery.

Required implementation

  1. Register canonical repository identity and accountable owner.
  2. Discover instruction precedence, components, dependencies, build commands, test topology, generated files, delivery configuration, data-sensitive paths, and external services.
  3. Mark every fact as authoritative, derived, inferred, or unknown with source commit and freshness.
  4. Build searchable code, symbol, dependency, ownership, and test-impact indexes.
  5. Ask the owner to validate material facts and correct one generated inference.
  6. Produce a workflow-specific readiness decision for read-only analysis, documentation change, low-risk code change, and production migration.
  7. Change the source commit and prove affected readiness evidence becomes stale.

Required failure

Hide the authoritative integration-test command from normal discovery. The system must surface incomplete test readiness and block the low-risk code-change path until an owner supplies and validates the missing contract.

Evidence and pass criteria

Retain the readiness record, source map, indexes, owner correction, blocked decision, refreshed decision, and drift event. The lab fails if repository registration automatically grants modification authority or inferred data classification is silently accepted.

Cleanup

Remove generated indexes and any checkout created for the lab. Preserve the redacted readiness and decision evidence.

Evidence boundary

Curriculum maturity is not implementation proof.

This chapter defines architecture or practice. It does not by itself prove a corresponding production implementation.

CurriculumReview readyImplementation evidenceNot asserted hereInspect evidence map →
External review

Review this chapter.

Challenge a claim, boundary, missing failure mode, unclear term, or unsupported evidence statement.

  • Claim
  • Boundary
  • Failure
  • Evidence